Andrus,

One more data point (based on another test):

I just change the "Delete Rule" associated with the three ObjEntities and then 
tried to save the project.  The dialog popped up:

        Title: Synchrnize ObjEntity with DbEntity
        CheckBox
                value: checked
                Question: Remove Foreign Keys Mapped as Object Attributes.
        Options:
                [Cancel [Continue]

1. I selected "continue" and CM did not freeze or report an exception.

Recommendation:
If I understood the previous discussion from earlier today, wouldn't it be more 
succinct to say:

        Question: "Add DbEntity Foreign Keys to ObjEntity Attribute List? (Not 
normally required)" 
        value: unchecked
        Options: [Cancel] [Continue]

because the current question almost sounds as if it is intending to remove the 
DbEntity attribute (which is why I was confused as to what actions it was going 
to take).

Joe





On Feb 2, 2010, at 10:40 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:

> 
> On Feb 2, 2010, at 4:53 PM, Joe Baldwin wrote:
> 
>> Still, I have created about 15-20 relationships with this same design and 
>> have never seen this dialog or this error before.
>> 
>> You are the expert, of course, however if I am to help out by reporting a 
>> problem I believe it would be helpful to first establish what I steps I took 
>> to precipitate the problem and the determine if it simply a user-procedural 
>> error.  In addition, I could have made a mistake, but what the CM has asked 
>> to do does not seem logical, so again it I think the initial user-procedure 
>> is a good place to start.  (I can increase memory all day long but if I am 
>> doing something out of order then it won't help the analysis.)
> 
> I second Mike's explanation of why this dialog is there.
> 
> But...  I just tried reproducing that with RC1 and I can't even cause this 
> dialog to appear, no matter whether I have meaningful FK or not. So something 
> is wrong somewhere in the Modeler. Also in OS X assembly the default -Xmx500m 
> that should be more than enough for any kind of projects.
> 
> Investigating...
> 
> Andrus
> 

Reply via email to