Hi, thank you for the hints. I'll try the patch. Are there any pitfalls when using this patch?
Thanks, Martin Andrus Adamchik schrieb: > Ok, it is more clear now (it is still not clear how exactly thread 5 > locks that PostgreSQL table, but the overall explanation makes sense). > One suggestion is to upgrade to Cayenne 3.0 (3.0M3 for now, and 3.0M4 > once that becomes available). It reduces the scope of the shared > DataRowStore lock per this Jira: > > https://issues.apache.org/cayenne/browse/CAY-722 > > Alternatively you may attempt to patch 1.2 based on CAY-722 diff: > > http://tinyurl.com/56ja5r > > Andrus
