It's not a hijacking. It is interesting to point out that JPA does not support tables without PKs -- I really should learn more about JPA soon. I can understand why, too (need to know what to update and how to make joins, etc). I'm kind of curious if Cayenne supports PK-less for read-only data now, though. Seems to me that could be a useful thing.
/dev/mrg On 6/6/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't want to hijack this thread, but just point out that JPA does not support tables without primary key; JDO does (including updates) as an optional feature. Craig
