I think cost is a very important point if you are going to use *single** token i*f your cluster will be very large , because every time the cluster is expanded, the nodes need to be doubled.100 -> 200, 200->400 ... This is one of the reasons why we maintain many small clusters.
of course its availability will be better . Abe Ratnofsky <a...@aber.io> 于2024年10月9日周三 11:56写道： > Here’s the best post I’m aware of: > https://jolynch.github.io/pdf/cassandra-availability-virtual.pdf > > On Oct 7, 2024, at 17:30, Long Pan <panlong...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Cassandra Community, > > I’m currently exploring the use of *single vnode* (single token) per node > in large-scale Cassandra deployments. I've come across discussions > suggesting that some heavy users like Apple and Netflix have opted for this > configuration to simplify operations and achieve more predictable > performance. > > I’d like to ask if anyone could point me to *resources* (blog posts, > conference talks, case studies or even personal experiences) that dive > deeper into: > > - The *rationale* behind using a single vnode instead of multiple > vnodes. > - The *operational benefits* and any potential trade-offs encountered. > > Thank you in advance for your insights and any pointers you can provide! > > Best regards, > Long > >
