Thanks for the tip Eric. We're actually on 3.2 and the issue isn't with the
Reaper. The issue is with Cassandra. It will report that a table has
pending compactions, but it will never actually start compacting. The
pending number stays at that level until we run a manual compaction.

-richard


On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 8:53 AM Eric Ferrenbach <
eric.ferrenb...@milliporesigma.com> wrote:

> We had issues where Reaper would never actually start some repairs.  The
> GUI would say RUNNING but the progress would be 0/xxxx.
>
> Datastax support said there is a bug and recommended upgrading to 3.2.
>
> Upgrading Reaper to 3.2 resolved our issue.
>
>
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Eric
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Richard Hesse <rhe...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Sunday, October 30, 2022 12:07 PM
> *To:* user@cassandra.apache.org
> *Subject:* Help determining pending compactions
>
>
>
> [WARNING - EXTERNAL EMAIL] Do not open links or attachments unless you
> recognize the sender of this email. If you are unsure please click the
> button "Report suspicious email"
>
>
>
> Hi, I'm hoping to get some help with a vexing issue with one of our
> keyspaces. During Reaper repair sessions, one keyspace will end up with
> hanging, non-started compactions. That is, the number of compactions as
> reported by nodetool compactionstats stays flat and there are no running
> compactions. Is there a way to determine which tables Cassandra is stuck on
> here?
>
>
>
> Looking at graphs of pending compactions during Reaper sessions, the
> number of compactions will shoot up (as expected). The number will work its
> way down, and sometimes it will stop and plateau at a fixed level. A full
> compaction will get things going again, but we prefer to avoid those (even
> with the -s option).
>
>
>
> I realize there are various compaction tuning parameters regarding minimum
> age, tombstone percentage, etc but I need to know which sstables to look at
> first before blindly changing values. These are leveled compaction strategy
> tables FWIW.
>
>
>
> TIA!
>
>
>
> -richard
>
>
>
> This message and any attachment are confidential and may be privileged or
> otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient,
> you must not copy this message or attachment or disclose the contents to
> any other person. If you have received this transmission in error, please
> notify the sender immediately and delete the message and any attachment
> from your system. Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany and any of its
> subsidiaries do not accept liability for any omissions or errors in this
> message which may arise as a result of E-Mail-transmission or for damages
> resulting from any unauthorized changes of the content of this message and
> any attachment thereto. Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany and any of its
> subsidiaries do not guarantee that this message is free of viruses and does
> not accept liability for any damages caused by any virus transmitted
> therewith.
>
>
>
> Click emdgroup.com/disclaimer
> <https://www.emdgroup.com/en/legal-disclaimer/mail-disclaimer.html> to
> access the German, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Turkish, Polish and Slovak
> versions of this disclaimer.
>
>
>
> Please find our Privacy Statement information by clicking here: 
> emdgroup.com/privacy-statement
> (U.S.) <https://www.emdgroup.com/en/privacy-statement.html> or 
> emdserono.com/privacy-statement
> (Canada) <https://www.emdserono.ca/ca-en/privacy-statement.html>
>

Reply via email to