Thank You
Sent using https://www.zoho.com/mail/ ---- On Tue, 16 Nov 2021 10:00:19 +0330 <a...@aber.io> wrote ---- > I can, but i thought with 5TB per node already violated best practices (1-2 >TB per node) and won't be a good idea to 2X or 3X that? The main downside of larger disks is that it takes longer to replace a host that goes down, since there’s less network capacity to move data from surviving instances to the new, replacement instances. The longer it takes to replace a host, the longer the time window when further failure may cause unavailability (for example: if you’re running in a 3-instance cluster, one node goes down and requires replacement, any additional nodes going down will cause downtime for reads that require a quorum). These are some of the main factors to consider here. You can always bump the disk capacity for one instance, measure replacement times, then decide whether to increase disk capacity across the cluster.
