I think you started at 4930 and ended at 5461, difference of 530 (which is the new host)
If you run `nodetool cleanup` on every other node in the cluster, you likely drop back down close to 4931 again. On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 12:04 PM Joe Obernberger < joseph.obernber...@gmail.com> wrote: > I recently added a node to a cluster. Immediately after adding the > node, the cluster status (nyx is the new node): > > UJ nyx.querymasters.com 181.25 KiB 250 ? > 07bccfce-45f1-41a3-a5c4-ee748a7a9b98 rack1 > UN enceladus.querymasters.com 569.53 GiB 200 35.1% > 660f476c-a124-4ca0-b55f-75efe56370da rack1 > UN calypso.querymasters.com 578.79 GiB 200 34.8% > e83aa851-69b4-478f-88f6-60e657ea6539 rack1 > UN fortuna.querymasters.com 593.79 GiB 200 34.6% > 49e4f571-7d1c-4e1e-aca7-5bbe076596f7 rack1 > UN charon.querymasters.com 603.3 GiB 200 35.0% > d9702f96-256e-45ae-8e12-69a42712be50 rack1 > UN eros.querymasters.com 589.04 GiB 200 34.2% > 93f9cb0f-ea71-4e3d-b62a-f0ea0e888c47 rack1 > UN hercules.querymasters.com 12.31 GiB 4 0.7% > a1a16910-9167-4174-b34b-eb859d36347e rack1 > UN ursula.querymasters.com 611.65 GiB 200 35.0% > 4bbbe57c-6219-41e5-bbac-de92a9594d53 rack1 > UN gaia.querymasters.com 480.62 GiB 200 34.7% > b2e5366e-8386-40ec-a641-27944a5a7cfa rack1 > UN chaos.querymasters.com 358.07 GiB 120 20.5% > 08a19658-40be-4e55-8709-812b3d4ac750 rack1 > UN pallas.querymasters.com 537.88 GiB 200 35.3% > b74b6e65-af63-486a-b07f-9e304ec30a39 rack1 > > If I add up the Load column, I get 4,632.67GiB. After overnight: > > [joeo@calypso ~]$ nodetool status -r > Datacenter: datacenter1 > ======================= > Status=Up/Down > |/ State=Normal/Leaving/Joining/Moving > -- Address Load Tokens Owns (effective) > Host ID Rack > UN nyx.querymasters.com 535.16 GiB 250 38.0% > 07bccfce-45f1-41a3-a5c4-ee748a7a9b98 rack1 > UN enceladus.querymasters.com 568.87 GiB 200 30.4% > 660f476c-a124-4ca0-b55f-75efe56370da rack1 > UN calypso.querymasters.com 578.81 GiB 200 30.4% > e83aa851-69b4-478f-88f6-60e657ea6539 rack1 > UN fortuna.querymasters.com 593.82 GiB 200 30.4% > 49e4f571-7d1c-4e1e-aca7-5bbe076596f7 rack1 > UN charon.querymasters.com 602.38 GiB 200 30.4% > d9702f96-256e-45ae-8e12-69a42712be50 rack1 > UN eros.querymasters.com 588.3 GiB 200 30.4% > 93f9cb0f-ea71-4e3d-b62a-f0ea0e888c47 rack1 > UN hercules.querymasters.com 12.31 GiB 4 0.6% > a1a16910-9167-4174-b34b-eb859d36347e rack1 > UN ursula.querymasters.com 610.54 GiB 200 30.3% > 4bbbe57c-6219-41e5-bbac-de92a9594d53 rack1 > UN gaia.querymasters.com 480.53 GiB 200 30.5% > b2e5366e-8386-40ec-a641-27944a5a7cfa rack1 > UN chaos.querymasters.com 358.44 GiB 120 18.2% > 08a19658-40be-4e55-8709-812b3d4ac750 rack1 > UN pallas.querymasters.com 537.94 GiB 200 30.4% > b74b6e65-af63-486a-b07f-9e304ec30a39 rack1 > > If I add up the Load, I get 5,466.79GiB. I have added no new data to > the cluster, yet the Load has increased by 834. Is this expected behavior? > Thank you! > > -Joe > >
