Hi all,

I am bumping this email hoping that it can reach a larger audience.

Thanks,
Joseph

On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 11:45 AM Joseph Wonesh <joseph.won...@sticknfind.com>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I have a materialized view defined by the following:
>
> CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW m_ps_project_policy_device0 AS
>        SELECT policy_id, device_id, project_id, namespace, metric_type, 
> blufi_id, beacon_id, event_uuid, state, date_created, policy_name, 
> beacon_name, blufi_name, value, duration FROM policy_state0
>        WHERE policy_id IS NOT NULL AND device_id IS NOT NULL AND project_id 
> IS NOT NULL AND namespace IS NOT NULL AND metric_type IS NOT NULL AND 
> blufi_id IS NOT NULL AND beacon_id IS NOT NULL AND event_uuid IS NOT NULL AND 
> state IS NOT NULL AND date_created IS NOT NULL
>        PRIMARY KEY ((project_id), policy_id, device_id, date_created, 
> blufi_id, beacon_id, state, namespace, metric_type, event_uuid)
>        WITH CLUSTERING ORDER BY (date_created DESC);
>
>
> This view works fine if i run a query like the following:
>
> SELECT * FROM m_ps_project_policy_device4 where project_id=1337 and
> policy_id=7331 and device_id='1234567890' limit 1;
>
> The result of this query gives me the most recent due to the date_created
> desc clustering order.
>
> However, this query does not behave as expected:
>
> SELECT * FROM m_ps_project_policy_device4 where project_id=1337 and
> policy_id=7331 and device_id='1234567890' group by policy_id, device_id
> limit 1;
>
> The result of this query gives me the FIRST record from the partition,
> which is the OLDEST record due to the clustering order desc.
>
> Is this a natural result due to my ordering? Would I need to use a view
> that has order by ASC to achieve what I want to do using the built-in group
> by aggregations? I am hoping there is a way to achieve what I want to do
> (getting the most recent record for each of the <project_id, policy_id,
> device_id> tuples using the built-in aggregation functions.
>
> Thanks,
> Joseph Wonesh
>

-- 
This message is private and confidential. If you have received message in 
error, please notify us and remove from your system. 

Reply via email to