There's a discussion about direct I/O here you might find interesting:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-14466

I suspect the main reason is that O_DIRECT wasn't added till Java 10, and
while it could be used with some workarounds, there's a lot of entropy
around changing something like this.  It's not a trivial task to do it
right, and mixing has some really nasty issues.

At least it means there's lots of room for improvement though :)


On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 5:36 AM Kyrylo Lebediev
<kyrylo_lebed...@epam.com.invalid> wrote:

> Thank you Jon, great article as usually!
>
>
> One topic that was discussed in the article is filesystem cache which is
> traditionally leveraged for data caching in Cassandra (with row-caching
> disabled by default).
>
> IIRC mmap() is used.
>
> Some RDBMS and NoSQL DB's as well use direct I/O + async I/O + maintain
> own, not kernel-managed, DB Cache thus improving overall performance.
>
> As Cassandra is designed to be a DB with low response time, this approach
> with DIO/AIO/DB Cache seems to be a really useful feature.
>
> Just out of curiosity, are there reasons why this advanced IO stack wasn't
> implemented, except lack of resources to do this?
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Kyrill
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Eric Plowe <eric.pl...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 8, 2018 9:39:44 PM
> *To:* user@cassandra.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: Compression Tuning Tutorial
>
> Great post, Jonathan! Thank you very much.
>
> ~Eric
>
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 2:34 PM Jonathan Haddad <j...@jonhaddad.com> wrote:
>
> Hey folks,
>
> We've noticed a lot over the years that people create tables usually
> leaving the default compression parameters, and have spent a lot of time
> helping teams figure out the right settings for their cluster based on
> their workload.  I finally managed to write some thoughts down along with a
> high level breakdown of how the internals function that should help people
> pick better settings for their cluster.
>
> This post focuses on a mixed 50:50 read:write workload, but the same
> conclusions are drawn from a read heavy workload.  Hopefully this helps
> some folks get better performance / save some money on hardware!
>
> http://thelastpickle.com/blog/2018/08/08/compression_performance.html
>
>
> --
> Jon Haddad
> Principal Consultant, The Last Pickle
>
>

-- 
Jon Haddad
http://www.rustyrazorblade.com
twitter: rustyrazorblade

Reply via email to