Jeff and Christophe, Thank you very much ! I'll take a look.
Jero On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 10:21 PM, Jeff Jirsa <jji...@gmail.com> wrote: > Probably closer to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-13289 > > > Will be in 4.0 > -- > Jeff Jirsa > > > On Mar 25, 2018, at 4:44 PM, Christophe Schmitz < > christo...@instaclustr.com> wrote: > > Hi Jeronimo, > > I am not sure that will address your exact request, but did you look at > this issue (resolved in 3.8) which adds a ned latency across DCs metrics? > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11569 > > Cheers, > > Christophe > > On 26 March 2018 at 10:01, Jeronimo de A. Barros < > jeronimo.bar...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I'd like to know if there is a reasonable method to measure how long take >> to have the data available across all replica nodes in a multi DC >> environment using LOCAL_ONE or LOCAL_QUORUM consistency levels. >> >> If already there be a study about this topic in some place and someone >> could point me the direction, it will be of great help. >> >> Thanks ! >> > > > > -- > > *Christophe Schmitz - **VP Consulting* > > AU: +61 4 03751980 / FR: +33 7 82022899 > > <https://www.facebook.com/instaclustr> <https://twitter.com/instaclustr> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/instaclustr> > > Read our latest technical blog posts here > <https://www.instaclustr.com/blog/>. This email has been sent on behalf > of Instaclustr Pty. Limited (Australia) and Instaclustr Inc (USA). This > email and any attachments may contain confidential and legally > privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, do not copy > or disclose its content, but please reply to this email immediately and > highlight the error to the sender and then immediately delete the message. > >
