This went nowhere quick. Come on everyone. The website has to support users who are on “supported” versions of the software. That’s more than one version. There was a JIRA on this months ago. You are smart people. I just gave a perfect answer and ended up burning a bunch of time for nothing. Now its back on you. Are you going to properly support the software you create or not!
Kenneth Brotman From: Kenneth Brotman [mailto:kenbrot...@yahoo.com.INVALID] Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 11:03 PM To: user@cassandra.apache.org Subject: RE: What versions should the documentation support now? I made sub directories “2_x” and “3_x” under docs and put a copy of the doc in each. No links were changed yet. We can work on the files first and discuss how we want to change the template and links. I did the pull request already. Kenneth Brotman From: Jonathan Haddad [mailto:j...@jonhaddad.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 6:19 PM To: user@cassandra.apache.org Subject: Re: What versions should the documentation support now? Yes, I agree, we should host versioned docs. I don't think anyone is against it, it's a matter of someone having the time to do it. On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 6:14 PM kurt greaves <k...@instaclustr.com> wrote: I’ve never heard of anyone shipping docs for multiple versions, I don’t know why we’d do that. You can get the docs for any version you need by downloading C*, the docs are included. I’m a firm -1 on changing that process. We should still host versioned docs on the website however. Either that or we specify "since version x" for each component in the docs with notes on behaviour.
