Again, I'd really like to get a feel for scylla vs rocksandra vs cassandra.
Isn't the driver binary protocol the easiest / least redesign level of storage engine swapping? Scylla and Cassandra and Rocksandra are currently three options. Rocksandra can expand out it's non-java footprint without rearchitecting the java codebase. Or are there serious concerns with Datastax and the binary protocols? On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 12:42 PM, Goutham reddy <goutham.chiru...@gmail.com> wrote: > It’s an interesting conversation. For more details about the pluggable > storage engine here is the link. > > Blog: > https://thenewstack.io/instagram-supercharges-cassandra-pluggable-rocksdb- > storage-engine/ > > JIRA: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/mobile# > issue/CASSANDRA-13475 > > > On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 9:01 AM Kenneth Brotman > <kenbrot...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote: > >> Just released on DataStax Distributed Data Show, DiKang Gu of Instagram >> interviewed by author Jeff Carpenter. >> >> Found it really interesting: Shadow clustering, migrating from 2.2 to >> 3.0, using the Rocks DB as a pluggable storage engine for Cassandra >> >> https://academy.datastax.com/content/distributed-data-show- >> episode-37-cassandra-instagram-dikang-gu >> >> >> >> Kenneth Brotman >> > -- > Regards > Goutham Reddy >
