Hello, Our 5 cents. Either 3.0.16 or 3.11.x We are really happy with the way 3.11.1/2 is behaving. We still have a lot of really well behaving Clusters in 2.1/2.2 latest.
Regards, Carlos Juzarte Rolo Cassandra Consultant / Datastax Certified Architect / Cassandra MVP Pythian - Love your data rolo@pythian | Twitter: @cjrolo | Skype: cjr2k3 | Linkedin: *linkedin.com/in/carlosjuzarterolo <http://linkedin.com/in/carlosjuzarterolo>* Mobile: +351 918 918 100 www.pythian.com On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 2:05 PM, Alain RODRIGUEZ <arodr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Tom, > > It's good to hear this kind of feedbacks, > > Thanks for sharing. > > 3.11.x seems to get more love from the community wrt patches. This is why >> I'd recommend 3.11.x for new projects. >> > > I also agree with this analysis. > > Stay away from any of the 2.x series, they're going EOL soonish and the >> newer versions are very stable. >> > > +1 here as well. Maybe add that 3.11.x, that is described as 'very stable' > above, aims at stabilizing Cassandra after the tick-tock releases and is a > 'bug fix' series and brings features developed during this period, even > though it is needed to be careful with of some the new features, even in > latest 3.11.x versions. > > I did not work that much with it yet, but I think I would pick 3.11.2 as > well for a new cluster at the moment. > > C*heers, > > ----------------------- > Alain Rodriguez - @arodream - al...@thelastpickle.com > France / Spain > > The Last Pickle - Apache Cassandra Consulting > http://www.thelastpickle.com > > > 2018-03-05 12:39 GMT+00:00 Tom van der Woerdt < > tom.vanderwoe...@booking.com>: > >> We run on the order of a thousand Cassandra nodes in production. Most of >> that is 3.0.16, but new clusters are defaulting to 3.11.2 and some older >> clusters have been upgraded to it as well. >> >> All of the bugs I encountered in 3.11.x were also seen in 3.0.x, but >> 3.11.x seems to get more love from the community wrt patches. This is why >> I'd recommend 3.11.x for new projects. >> >> Stay away from any of the 2.x series, they're going EOL soonish and the >> newer versions are very stable. >> >> Tom van der Woerdt >> Site Reliability Engineer >> >> Booking.com B.V. >> Vijzelstraat 66 >> <https://maps.google.com/?q=Vijzelstraat+66&entry=gmail&source=g>-80 >> Amsterdam 1017HL Netherlands >> [image: Booking.com] <http://www.booking.com/> >> The world's #1 accommodation site >> 43 languages, 198+ offices worldwide, 120,000+ global destinations, >> 1,550,000+ room nights booked every day >> No booking fees, best price always guaranteed >> Subsidiary of Booking Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: BKNG) >> >> On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 12:25 AM, Jeff Jirsa <jji...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I’d personally be willing to run 3.0.16 >>> >>> 3.11.2 or 3 whatever should also be similar, but I haven’t personally >>> tested it at any meaningful scale >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Jeff Jirsa >>> >>> >>> On Mar 2, 2018, at 2:37 PM, Kenneth Brotman < >>> kenbrot...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote: >>> >>> Seems like a lot of people are running old versions of Cassandra. What >>> is the best version, most reliable stable version to use now? >>> >>> >>> >>> Kenneth Brotman >>> >>> >> > -- --
