Yes, that's LIKELY "better".
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 8:10 AM, Micha <mich...@fantasymail.de> wrote: > ok, thanks for the answer. > > So the better approach here is to adjust the table schema to get the > partition size to around 100MB max. > This means using a partition key with multiple parts and making more > selects instead of one when querying the data (which may increase > parallelism). > > Michael > > > >
