I would suggest to read this post by the last pickle:
http://thelastpickle.com/blog/2016/09/15/Null-bindings-on-prepared-statements-and-undesired-tombstone-creation.html
 and make sure you are not concerned by the mentioned behavior, because
some people still choose to use C* v2.X because of some bugs in v3 branch

Have fun !

On 29 August 2017 at 13:43, Shalom Sagges <shal...@liveperson.com> wrote:

> Sounds great then.
>
> Thanks a lot guys! 🙂
>
>
> Shalom Sagges
> DBA
> <http://www.linkedin.com/company/164748> <http://twitter.com/liveperson>
> <http://www.facebook.com/LivePersonInc> We Create Meaningful Connections
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Nicolas Guyomar <
> nicolas.guyo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Shalom,
>>
>> AFAIK, you are completely safe with prepared statement, there are no
>> caveats using them, and you will have better performance.
>>
>> Make sure to only prepare them once ;)
>>
>> On 29 August 2017 at 13:41, Matija Gobec <matija0...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I don't see any disadvantages or warning signs. You will see a
>>> performance increase on moderate request rate frequency.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Shalom Sagges <shal...@liveperson.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Matija,
>>>>
>>>> I just wish to know if there are any disadvantages when using prepared
>>>> statement or any warning signs I should look for. Queries will run multiple
>>>> times so it fits the use case.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Shalom Sagges
>>>> DBA
>>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/company/164748>
>>>> <http://twitter.com/liveperson> <http://www.facebook.com/LivePersonInc> We
>>>> Create Meaningful Connections
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Matija Gobec <matija0...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Do you have any concrete questions re prepared statements?
>>>>>
>>>>> They are faster to execute since the statement is already parsed and
>>>>> in C* and you just pass the parameters. No additional statement processing
>>>>> is needed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Matija
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Shalom Sagges <
>>>>> shal...@liveperson.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Insights, anyone?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Shalom Sagges
>>>>>> DBA
>>>>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/company/164748>
>>>>>> <http://twitter.com/liveperson>
>>>>>> <http://www.facebook.com/LivePersonInc> We Create Meaningful
>>>>>> Connections
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Shalom Sagges <
>>>>>> shal...@liveperson.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I want to start working with Prepared Statements.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've read https://docs.datastax.com/en/developer/java-driver/3.1/
>>>>>>> manual/statements/prepared/ and just wanted to know if there are
>>>>>>> any other considerations I need to take into account when deciding to 
>>>>>>> use
>>>>>>> Prepared Statements.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Shalom Sagges
>>>>>>> DBA
>>>>>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/company/164748>
>>>>>>> <http://twitter.com/liveperson>
>>>>>>> <http://www.facebook.com/LivePersonInc> We Create Meaningful
>>>>>>> Connections
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
>>>>>> If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this on behalf
>>>>>> of the addressee you must not use, copy, disclose or take action based on
>>>>>> this message or any information herein.
>>>>>> If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender
>>>>>> immediately by reply email and delete this message. Thank you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
>>>> If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this on behalf of
>>>> the addressee you must not use, copy, disclose or take action based on this
>>>> message or any information herein.
>>>> If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender
>>>> immediately by reply email and delete this message. Thank you.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
> If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this on behalf of
> the addressee you must not use, copy, disclose or take action based on this
> message or any information herein.
> If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender
> immediately by reply email and delete this message. Thank you.
>

Reply via email to