Couldn't set up as couldn't get it working, or its not allowed?
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 3:23 PM Siddharth Verma <verma.siddha...@snapdeal.com>
wrote:

> Hi Jon,
> We couldn't setup a spark cluster.
>
> For some use case, a spark cluster was required, but for some reason we
> couldn't create spark cluster. Hence, one may use this utility to iterate
> through the entire table at very high speed.
>
> Had to find a work around, that would be faster than paging on result set.
>
> Regards
>
> Siddharth Verma
> *Software Engineer I - CaMS*
> *M*: +91 9013689856, *T*: 011 22791596 *EXT*: 14697
> CA2125, 2nd Floor, ASF Centre-A, Jwala Mill Road,
> Udyog Vihar Phase - IV, Gurgaon-122016, INDIA
> Download Our App
> [image: A]
> <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.snapdeal.main&utm_source=mobileAppLp&utm_campaign=android>
>  [image:
> A]
> <https://itunes.apple.com/in/app/snapdeal-mobile-shopping/id721124909?ls=1&mt=8&utm_source=mobileAppLp&utm_campaign=ios>
>  [image:
> W]
> <http://www.windowsphone.com/en-in/store/app/snapdeal/ee17fccf-40d0-4a59-80a3-04da47a5553f>
>
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 12:41 AM, Jonathan Haddad <j...@jonhaddad.com>
> wrote:
>
> It almost sounds like you're duplicating all the work of both spark and
> the connector. May I ask why you decided to not use the existing tools?
>
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 2:21 PM siddharth verma <
> sidd.verma29.l...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi DuyHai,
> Thanks for your reply.
> A few more features planned in the next one(if there is one) like,
> custom policy keeping in mind the replication of token range on specific
> nodes,
> fine graining the token range(for more speedup),
> and a few more.
>
> I think, as fine graining a token range,
> If one token range is split further in say, 2-3 parts, divided among
> threads, this would exploit the possible parallelism on a large scaled out
> cluster.
>
> And, as you mentioned the JIRA, streaming of request, that would of huge
> help with further splitting the range.
>
> Thanks once again for your valuable comments. :-)
>
> Regards,
> Siddharth Verma
>
>
>

Reply via email to