That ticket was just to improve the error message.  From the comments on
the ticket:

"Unfortunately, handling collections is slightly harder than what
CASSANDRA-5230 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-5230> aimed
for, because we can't do a name query. So this will have to wait for
CASSANDRA-4762 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-4762>. In
the meantime, we should obviously not throw an assertion error so attaching
a patch to improve validation."

However, it seems like this would be possible to support in Cassandra 3.x.
We probably just need to remove the check and verify that it actually
works.  Can you open a new JIRA ticket for this?

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Samba <saas...@gmail.com> wrote:

> any update on this issue?
>
> the quoted JIRA issue (CASSANDRA-5376) is resolved as fixed in 1.2.4 but
> it is still not possible (even in 3.7)  to use IN operator in queries that
> fetch collection columns.
>
> is the fix only to report better error message that this is not possible
> or was it fixed then but the issue resurfaced in regression?
>
> could you please confirm one way or the other?
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> Samba
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Samba <saas...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> "CASSANDRA-5376: CQL IN clause on last key not working when schema
>> includes set,list or map"
>>
>> is marked resolved in 1.2.4 but i still see the issue (not an Assertion
>> Error, but an query validation message)
>>
>> was the issue resolved only to report proper error message or was it
>> fixed to support retrieving collections when query contains IN clause of
>> partition/cluster (last) columns?
>>
>> If it was fixed properly to support retrieving collections with IN
>> clause, then is it a bug in 3.7 release that i get the same message?
>>
>> Could you please explain, if it not fixed as intended, if there are plans
>> to support this in future?
>>
>> Thanks & Regards,
>> Samba
>>
>
>


-- 
Tyler Hobbs
DataStax <http://datastax.com/>

Reply via email to