Hi Kathir, The specific version will depend on your needs (eg. libraries) and risk/stability profile. Personally, I generally go with the oldest branch with still active maintenance (which would be 2.2.x or 2.1.x if you only need critical fixes), but there's lots of good stuff in 3.x if you're happy being a little closer to the bleeding edge.
There was a bit of discussion elsewhere on this list, eg here: https://www.mail-archive.com/user@cassandra.apache.org/msg45990.html, searching may turn up some more recommendations. --Bryan On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Kathiresan S <kathiresanselva...@gmail.com > wrote: > Hi, > > We are planning for Cassandra upgrade in our production environment. > Which version of Cassandra is stable and is advised to upgrade to, at the > moment? > > Looking at this JIRA (CASSANDRA-10822 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10822>), it looks like, > if at all we plan to upgrade any recent version, it should be >= 3.0.2/3.2 > > Should it be 3.0.4 / 3.0.3 / 3.3 or 3.4 ? In general, is it a good > practice to upgrade to a Tick-Tock release instead of 3.0.X version. Please > advice. > > Thanks, > Kathir >
