> Don't do it [C* on NAS storage] Yes, I know ;-) it’s an anti-pattern.
Let’s me give more info. We expect moving from a high-end SAN (<= yes, I know !) to local hard drives. Due to lack time (I won’t dig into it here), we expect in fact moving like this: SAN => RAIN => local HDD (for storage) So, the questions: - for C* storage point of view, is RAIN performance similar to a SAN ? - or, is C* on RAIN much, much worse than C* on SAN ? Any return/experience will be appreciated. Thanks. Dominique De : Jonathan Haddad [mailto:j...@jonhaddad.com] Envoyé : vendredi 4 mars 2016 17:56 À : user@cassandra.apache.org Objet : Re: Cassandra runing on top of NAS (RAIN storage) !?? anyone ? Don't do it On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 8:39 AM DE VITO Dominique <dominique.dev...@thalesgroup.com<mailto:dominique.dev...@thalesgroup.com>> wrote: Hi, Is there any info about running C* on top of a NAS storage, well, a RAIN storage (to be precise) in fact ? I expect C* to run on top of a RAIN like on top of a high-end SAN: that is, with a drop (-50%) in performance. Any return available ? Thanks. Regards, Dominique
