What sort of data is your clustering key composed of? That might help some
in determining a way to achieve what you're looking for.

Clint
On Jan 5, 2016 2:28 PM, "Jim Ancona" <j...@anconafamily.com> wrote:

> Hi Nate,
>
> Yes, I've been thinking about treating customers as either small or big,
> where "small" ones have a single partition and big ones have 50 (or
> whatever number I need to keep sizes reasonable). There's still the problem
> of how to handle a small customer who becomes too big, but that will happen
> much less frequently than a customer filling a partition.
>
> Jim
>
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Nate McCall <n...@thelastpickle.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>> In this case, 99% of my data could fit in a single 50 MB partition. But
>>> if I use the standard approach, I have to split my partitions into 50
>>> pieces to accommodate the largest data. That means that to query the 700
>>> rows for my median case, I have to read 50 partitions instead of one.
>>>
>>> If you try to deal with this by starting a new partition when an old one
>>> fills up, you have a nasty distributed consensus problem, along with
>>> read-before-write. Cassandra LWT wasn't available the last time I dealt
>>> with this, but might help with the consensus part today. But there are
>>> still some nasty corner cases.
>>>
>>> I have some thoughts on other ways to solve this, but they all have
>>> drawbacks. So I thought I'd ask here and hope that someone has a better
>>> approach.
>>>
>>>
>> Hi Jim - good to see you around again.
>>
>> If you can segment this upstream by customer/account/whatever, handling
>> the outliers as an entirely different code path (potentially different
>> cluster as the workload will be quite different at that point and have
>> different tuning requirements) would be your best bet. Then a
>> read-before-write makes sense given it is happening on such a small number
>> of API queries.
>>
>>
>> --
>> -----------------
>> Nate McCall
>> Austin, TX
>> @zznate
>>
>> Co-Founder & Sr. Technical Consultant
>> Apache Cassandra Consulting
>> http://www.thelastpickle.com
>>
>
>

Reply via email to