one more good summary: http://superuser.com/questions/845143/any-limitation-for-having-many-files-in-a-directory-in-mac-os-x
2015-04-07 13:49 GMT+02:00 Serega Sheypak <serega.shey...@gmail.com>: > That is the reason for trying to work with ZFS. Unfortunately, it was > dropped. > And that is the reason pcie interface for SSD in my MacBook pro. > > 2015-04-07 13:46 GMT+02:00 Serega Sheypak <serega.shey...@gmail.com>: > >> HFS: >> The Catalog File, which stores all the file and directory records in a >> single data structure, results in performance problems when the system >> allows multitasking <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_multitasking>, >> as only one program can write to this structure at a time, meaning that >> many programs may be waiting in queue due to one program "hogging" the >> system.[2] >> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hierarchical_File_System#cite_note-2> >> >> HFS+ >> The HFS Plus Catalog File is very similar to the HFS Catalog File >> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hierarchical_File_System#Design>, the main >> differences being records are larger to allow more fields and to allow for >> those fields to be larger (for example to allow the longer 255-character >> unicode file names in HFS Plus). A record in the HFS Catalog File is 512 >> bytes in size, a record in the HFS Plus Catalog File is 4 KB in Mac OS and >> 8 KB in OS X. Fields in HFS are of fixed size, in HFS Plus the size can >> vary depending on the actual size of the data they store. >> >> 2015-04-07 13:41 GMT+02:00 Serega Sheypak <serega.shey...@gmail.com>: >> >>> It's single-threaded for writing :) >>> >>> 2015-04-07 13:13 GMT+02:00 Jean Tremblay < >>> jean.tremb...@zen-innovations.com>: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Why do everyone say that Cassandra should not be used in production on >>>> an Mac OS x? >>>> Why would this not work? >>>> Are there anyone out there using OS x in production? What is your >>>> experience with this? >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> Jean >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
