Hello, If i have a custom type EventDefinition and i create a table like
create table TestTable { user_id long, ts timestamp, definition 'com.anishek.EventDefinition', Primary Key (user_id, ts)) with clustering order by (ts desc) and compression={'sstable_compression' : 'SnappyCompressor'} and compaction = {'class': 'DateTieredCompactionStrategy', 'base_time_seconds':'3600', 'max_sstable_age_days':'30'}; then how would the data stored internally, based on http://www.datastax.com/dev/blog/thrift-to-cql3 "Dynamic Column Family" section would the data be as below given EventDefinition results in storing the following string representation "code, eventName Row : Columns 1 : 2015-03-02 14:33:14+0000="12,a" 2015-03-02 14:34:14+0000="11,b" 2015-03-02 14:35:14+0000="15,e" 2015-03-02 14:36:14+0000="17,c" 2015-03-02 14:37:14+0000="1,d" 2 : 2015-03-02 14:33:14+0000="12,a" 2015-03-02 14:34:14+0000="11,b" 2015-03-02 14:35:14+0000="15,e" 2015-03-02 14:36:14+0000="17,c" 2015-03-02 14:37:14+0000="1,d" Is the above correct ? We will be getting above events per day for a user and new users keep getting added to the system. We are presently assuming that we might have about 30 events at max for a given user. Given we will add data like insert into TestTable(user_id,ts, definition) values(a, "2015-03-02 12:30:56", "1,s") using ttl [30 days]; I am assuming that date tired compaction will not be very effective if the timestamp is not in the same timezone across entries. thanks Anishek