>
> I have Cassandra instances running on VMs with smaller RAM (1GB even) and
> I don't go OOM when testing them. Although I use them in AWS and other
> providers, never tried Digital Ocean.
> Does Cassandra just fails after some time running or it is failing on some
> specific read/write?


Hi  Carlos,

Ok, that's really interesting. So I have to ask, did you have to do
anything special to get Cassandra to run on those 1GB AWS instances? I'd
love to do the same. I even tried there as well and failed due to lack of
memory to run it.

And there is no specific reason other than lack of memory that I can tell
for it to fail. And it doesn's seem to matter what data I use either.
Because even if I remove the data directory with rm -rf, the phenomenon is
the same. It'll run for a while, usually about 5 hours and then just crash
with the word 'killed' as the last line of output.

Thanks
Tim


On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 3:40 AM, Carlos Rolo <r...@pythian.com> wrote:

> I have Cassandra instances running on VMs with smaller RAM (1GB even) and
> I don't go OOM when testing them. Although I use them in AWS and other
> providers, never tried Digital Ocean.
>
> Does Cassandra just fails after some time running or it is failing on some
> specific read/write?
>
> Regards,
>
> Carlos Juzarte Rolo
> Cassandra Consultant
>
> Pythian - Love your data
>
> rolo@pythian | Twitter: cjrolo | Linkedin: *linkedin.com/in/carlosjuzarterolo
> <http://linkedin.com/in/carlosjuzarterolo>*
> Tel: 1649
> www.pythian.com
>
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 7:16 AM, Tim Dunphy <bluethu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hey guys,
>>
>> After the upgrade to 2.1.3, and after almost exactly 5 hours running
>> cassandra did indeed crash again on the 2GB ram VM.
>>
>> This is how the memory on the VM looked after the crash:
>>
>> [root@web2:~] #free -m
>>              total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
>> Mem:          2002       1227        774          8         45        386
>> -/+ buffers/cache:        794       1207
>> Swap:            0          0          0
>>
>>
>> And that's with this set in the cassandra-env.sh file:
>>
>> MAX_HEAP_SIZE="800M"
>> HEAP_NEWSIZE="200M"
>>
>> So I'm thinking now, do I just have to abandon this idea I have of
>> running Cassandra on a 2GB instance? Or is this something we can all agree
>> can be done? And if so, how can we do that? :)
>>
>> Thanks
>> Tim
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 8:39 PM, Jason Kushmaul | WDA <
>> jason.kushm...@wda.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I asked this previously when a similar message came through, with a
>>> similar response.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> planetcassandra seems to have it “right”, in that stable=2.0,
>>> development=2.1, whereas the apache site says stable is 2.1.
>>>
>>> “Right” in they assume latest minor version is development.  Why not
>>> have the apache site do the same?  That’s just my lowly non-contributing
>>> opinion though.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Jason  *
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Andrew [mailto:redmu...@gmail.com]
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 18, 2015 8:26 PM
>>> *To:* Robert Coli; user@cassandra.apache.org
>>> *Subject:* Re: run cassandra on a small instance
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Robert,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Let me know if I’m off base about this—but I feel like I see a lot of
>>> posts that are like this (i.e., use this arbitrary version, not this other
>>> arbitrary version).  Why are releases going out if they’re “broken”?  This
>>> seems like a very confusing way for new (and existing) users to approach
>>> versions...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Andrew
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On February 18, 2015 at 5:16:27 PM, Robert Coli (rc...@eventbrite.com)
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Tim Dunphy <bluethu...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm attempting to run Cassandra 2.1.2 on a smallish 2.GB ram instance
>>> over at Digital Ocean. It's a CentOS 7 host.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2.1.2 is IMO broken and should not be used for any purpose.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Use 2.1.1 or 2.1.3.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> https://engineering.eventbrite.com/what-version-of-cassandra-should-i-run/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> =Rob
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> GPG me!!
>>
>> gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys F186197B
>>
>>
>
> --
>
>
>
>


-- 
GPG me!!

gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys F186197B

Reply via email to