@Rob - he's probably referring to the thread titled "Reasons for nodes not compacting?" where Tyler speculates that the tables are falling below the cold read threshold for compaction. He speculated it may be a bug. At the same time in a different thread, Roland had a similar problem, and Tyler's proposed workaround seemed to work for him.
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Robert Coli <rc...@eventbrite.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Flavien Charlon < > flavien.char...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> It's set on all the tables, as I'm using the default for all the tables. >> But for that particular table there are 41 SSTables between 60MB and 85MB, >> it should only take 4 for the compaction to kick in. >> > > What version of Cassandra are you running? > > Are they all "live"? Are there pending compactions, or exceptions > regarding compactions in your logs? > > >> As this is probably a bug and going back in the mailing list archive, it >> seems it's already been reported: >> > > This is a weird statement. Are you saying that you've found it in the > mailing list archives? If so, why not paste the threads so those of us who > might remember can refer to them? > >> >> - Will it be fixed in 2.1.3? >> >> https://engineering.eventbrite.com/what-version-of-cassandra-should-i-run/ > > > =Rob > >
