V
On Dec 4, 2014 11:14 PM, "Philo Yang" <ud1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,all
>
> I have a cluster on C* 2.1.1 and jdk 1.7_u51. I have a trouble with full
> gc that sometime there may be one or two nodes full gc more than one time
> per minute and over 10 seconds each time, then the node will be unreachable
> and the latency of cluster will be increased.
>
> I grep the GCInspector's log, I found when the node is running fine
> without gc trouble there are two kinds of gc:
> ParNew GC in less than 300ms which clear the Par Eden Space and
> enlarge CMS Old Gen/ Par Survivor Space little (because it only show gc in
> more than 200ms, there is only a small number of ParNew GC in log)
> ConcurrentMarkSweep in 4000~8000ms which reduce CMS Old Gen much and
> enlarge Par Eden Space little, each 1-2 hours it will be executed once.
>
> However, sometimes ConcurrentMarkSweep will be strange like it shows:
>
> INFO  [Service Thread] 2014-12-05 11:28:44,629 GCInspector.java:142 -
> ConcurrentMarkSweep GC in 12648ms.  CMS Old Gen: 3579838424 -> 3579838464;
> Par Eden Space: 503316480 -> 294794576; Par Survivor Space: 62914528 -> 0
> INFO  [Service Thread] 2014-12-05 11:28:59,581 GCInspector.java:142 -
> ConcurrentMarkSweep GC in 12227ms.  CMS Old Gen: 3579838464 -> 3579836512;
> Par Eden Space: 503316480 -> 310562032; Par Survivor Space: 62872496 -> 0
> INFO  [Service Thread] 2014-12-05 11:29:14,686 GCInspector.java:142 -
> ConcurrentMarkSweep GC in 11538ms.  CMS Old Gen: 3579836688 -> 3579805792;
> Par Eden Space: 503316480 -> 332391096; Par Survivor Space: 62914544 -> 0
> INFO  [Service Thread] 2014-12-05 11:29:29,371 GCInspector.java:142 -
> ConcurrentMarkSweep GC in 12180ms.  CMS Old Gen: 3579835784 -> 3579829760;
> Par Eden Space: 503316480 -> 351991456; Par Survivor Space: 62914552 -> 0
> INFO  [Service Thread] 2014-12-05 11:29:45,028 GCInspector.java:142 -
> ConcurrentMarkSweep GC in 10574ms.  CMS Old Gen: 3579838112 -> 3579799752;
> Par Eden Space: 503316480 -> 366222584; Par Survivor Space: 62914560 -> 0
> INFO  [Service Thread] 2014-12-05 11:29:59,546 GCInspector.java:142 -
> ConcurrentMarkSweep GC in 11594ms.  CMS Old Gen: 3579831424 -> 3579817392;
> Par Eden Space: 503316480 -> 388702928; Par Survivor Space: 62914552 -> 0
> INFO  [Service Thread] 2014-12-05 11:30:14,153 GCInspector.java:142 -
> ConcurrentMarkSweep GC in 11463ms.  CMS Old Gen: 3579817392 -> 3579838424;
> Par Eden Space: 503316480 -> 408992784; Par Survivor Space: 62896720 -> 0
> INFO  [Service Thread] 2014-12-05 11:30:25,009 GCInspector.java:142 -
> ConcurrentMarkSweep GC in 9576ms.  CMS Old Gen: 3579838424 -> 3579816424;
> Par Eden Space: 503316480 -> 438633608; Par Survivor Space: 62914544 -> 0
> INFO  [Service Thread] 2014-12-05 11:30:39,929 GCInspector.java:142 -
> ConcurrentMarkSweep GC in 11556ms.  CMS Old Gen: 3579816424 -> 3579785496;
> Par Eden Space: 503316480 -> 441354856; Par Survivor Space: 62889528 -> 0
> INFO  [Service Thread] 2014-12-05 11:30:54,085 GCInspector.java:142 -
> ConcurrentMarkSweep GC in 12082ms.  CMS Old Gen: 3579786592 -> 3579814464;
> Par Eden Space: 503316480 -> 448782440; Par Survivor Space: 62914560 -> 0
>
> In each time Old Gen reduce only a little, Survivor Space will be clear
> but the heap is still full so there will be another full gc very soon then
> the node will down. If I restart the node, it will be fine without gc
> trouble.
>
> Can anyone help me to find out where is the problem that full gc can't
> reduce CMS Old Gen? Is it because there are too many objects in heap can't
> be recycled? I think review the table scheme designing and add new nodes
> into cluster is a good idea, but I still want to know if there is any other
> reason causing this trouble.
>
> Thanks,
> Philo Yang
>
>

Reply via email to