50% is the official statement. It depends on the workload and machine capabilities. But AFAIK 50% is a rough estimate.
CQL over the native protocol is generally faster than Thrift. Native protocol also allows the client (e.g. the DataStax Drivers) to get informed about cluster changes (node add/remove/up/down), schema changes, etc. It also allows asynchronous execution of commands and requires just a few TCP connections thus lowering OS resource usage. Am 20.08.2014 um 23:09 schrieb Tony Anecito <adanec...@yahoo.com>: > One last question. I read on someones blog that 2.1 will be up to 50% faster > than 2.0.9 and that CQL will be the fastest to use rather than thrift. Any > comments/thoughts on that?
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail