50% is the official statement. It depends on the workload and machine 
capabilities. But AFAIK 50% is a rough estimate.

CQL over the native protocol is generally faster than Thrift. Native protocol 
also allows the client (e.g. the DataStax Drivers) to get informed about 
cluster changes (node add/remove/up/down), schema changes, etc. It also allows 
asynchronous execution of commands and requires just a few TCP connections thus 
lowering OS resource usage.

Am 20.08.2014 um 23:09 schrieb Tony Anecito <adanec...@yahoo.com>:

> One last question. I read on someones blog that 2.1 will be up to 50% faster 
> than 2.0.9 and that CQL will be the fastest to use rather than thrift. Any 
> comments/thoughts on that?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Reply via email to