or :

select * from skill_count where skill='Complaints'
and (interval_id,skill_level) >= (1402359300000,5)
and (interval_id) < (1402359900000)

Strange enough, when starting using tuple notation you'll need to stick to
it even if there is only one element in the tuple


On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 1:40 PM, DuyHai Doan <doanduy...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Sorry, I've just checked, the correct query should be:
>
> select * from skill_count where skill='Complaints' and
> (interval_id,skill_level) >= (1402359300000,5) and
> (interval_id,skill_level) < (1402359900000,11)
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 9:45 AM, DuyHai Doan <doanduy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello Mathew
>>
>>  Since Cassandra 2.0.6 it is possible to query over composites:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-4851
>>
>> For your example:
>>
>> select * from skill_count where skill='Complaints' and
>> (interval_id,skill_level) >= (1402359300000,5) and interval_id <
>> 1402359900000;
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 6:09 AM, Matthew Allen <matthew.j.al...@gmail.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We have a roll-up table that as follows.
>>>
>>> CREATE TABLE SKILL_COUNT (
>>>   skill text,
>>>   interval_id bigint,
>>>   skill_level int,
>>>   skill_count int,
>>>   PRIMARY KEY (skill, interval_id, skill_level));
>>>
>>> Essentially,
>>>   skill = a names skill i.e. "Complaints"
>>>   interval_id = a rounded epoch time (15 minute intervals)
>>>   skill_level = a number/rating from 1-10
>>>   skill_count = the number of people with the specified skill, with the
>>> specified skill level, logged in at the interval_id
>>>
>>> We'd like to run the following query against it
>>>
>>> select * from skill_count where skill='Complaints' and interval_id >=
>>> 1402359300000 and interval_id < 1402359900000 and skill_level >= 5;
>>>
>>> to get a count of people with the relevant skill and level at the
>>> appropriate time.  However I am getting the following message.
>>>
>>> Bad Request: PRIMARY KEY part skill_level cannot be restricted
>>> (preceding part interval_id is either not restricted or by a non-EQ
>>> relation)
>>>
>>> Looking at how the data is stored ...
>>>
>>> -------------------
>>> RowKey: Complaints
>>> => (name=1402359300000:2:, value=, timestamp=1405308260403000)
>>> => (name=1402359300000:2:skill_count, value=0000000a,
>>> timestamp=1405308260403000)
>>> => (name=1402359300000:5:, value=, timestamp=1405308260403001)
>>> => (name=1402359300000:5:skill_count, value=00000014,
>>> timestamp=1405308260403001)
>>> => (name=1402359300000:8:, value=, timestamp=1405308260419000)
>>> => (name=1402359300000:8:skill_count, value=0000001e,
>>> timestamp=1405308260419000)
>>> => (name=1402359300000:10:, value=, timestamp=1405308260419001)
>>> => (name=1402359300000:10:skill_count, value=00000001,
>>> timestamp=1405308260419001)
>>>
>>> Should cassandra be able to allow for an extra level of filtering ? or
>>> is this something that should be performed from within the application.
>>>
>>> We have a solution working in Oracle, but would like to store this data
>>> in Cassandra, as all the other data that this solution relies on already
>>> sits within Cassandra.
>>>
>>> Appreciate any guidance on this matter.
>>>
>>> Matt
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to