I think you are going to be creating problems that the drivers were designed to avoid, it is not a good idea in general.
/je On Jun 27, 2014, at 11:28 AM, Serge Fonville <[email protected]> wrote: > Hector is same way, if any node is slow to responds, times out or dies hector > will remove it from the pool leaving making it look like cluster dead. The > entire fault tolerant part of cassandra would be lost. > Does this still apply if all nodes contain all data? > > Kind regards/met vriendelijke groet, > > Serge Fonville > > http://www.sergefonville.nl > > > 2014-06-27 18:04 GMT+02:00 Chris Lohfink <[email protected]>: > Hector is same way, if any node is slow to responds, times out or dies hector > will remove it from the pool leaving making it look like cluster dead. The > entire fault tolerant part of cassandra would be lost. > > Chris > > On Jun 27, 2014, at 11:00 AM, Michael Dykman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > NO, really it can't. I know little of Hector, but when using the > > datastax driver, Cassandra provides a highly available set of > > connections; a single Cassandra session will have explicit connections > > to all of the node which make up a given cluster. > > > > The Cassandra server itself relies on a lot of cross-node talk which > > means that they must be visible to each other. In this case, HA proxy > > will just get in the way and make you less highly available. > > > > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Richard Jennings > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Can a Cassandra client such as Hector operate successfully behind a HA > >> Proxy > >> where the cluster is represented by a single IP Address? > >> > >> Regards > > > > > > > > -- > > - michael dykman > > - [email protected] > > > > May the Source be with you. > >
