On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Batranut Bogdan <batra...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> During the development of our entire system we generated huge tables (GB > or TB) then had to drop them since we changed the definition. This takes up > space. There is a constant write on the system so we want to optimize our > cluster. Basicaly not expanding untill the real need is there. > Yep, DROP not actually DROPping is weird alright. I personally think that more people are likely to win from this behavior than lose, but it is certainly unexpected. =Rob
