Can someone from Datastax confirm this point ? If it's true, is it the same for a decommission ? I mean, if we decommission a node with old data (in case it has been down for more than max_hint_window_in_ms and not repaired), will we finally have a situation where old data has been spread and we need to use repair -pr everywhere to not get (really) old data with LOCAL_ONE consistency ?
I use branch cassandra-1.2 but if there are differences between this branch and cassandra-2.0 tell me. Thanks -- Cyril SCETBON On 23 Jan 2014, at 21:53, Robert Coli <rc...@eventbrite.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 7:16 AM, Tupshin Harper <tups...@tupshin.com> wrote: > This should be the doc you are looking for. > > http://www.datastax.com/documentation/cassandra/2.0/webhelp/index.html#cassandra/operations/ops_add_dc_to_cluster_t.html > > > Rebuild (like bootstrap) only streams data from a single source replica per > range. IMO, therefore, the above process "should" end with a "repair all > nodes in both data centers with -pr" step. Otherwise, requests to the new DC > with LOCAL_X ConsistencyLevels or CL.ONE may violate consistency. > > I have bcc:ed d...@datastax.com, in case they agree and want to modify the > above doc. :D > > =Rob >
