On Thursday, February 20, 2014, Robert Coli <rc...@eventbrite.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 9:12 AM, Sylvain Lebresne <sylv...@datastax.com>
wrote:
>>
>> Of course, if everyone was using that reasoning, no-one would ever test
new features and report problems/suggest improvement. So thanks to anyone
like RĂ¼diger that actually tries stuff and take the time to report problems
when they think they encounter one. Keep at it, *you* are the one helping
Cassandra to get better everyday.
>
>
> Perhaps people who are prototyping their first application with a piece
of software are not the ideal people to beta test it?
>
> The people catching new version bullets for the community should be
experienced operators choosing to do so in development and staging
environments.
> The current paradigm ensures that new users have to deal with Cassandra
problems that interfere with their prototyping process and initial
production deploy, presumably getting a very bad initial impression of
Cassandra in the process.
> =Rob
>

You would be surprised how many people pick software a of software b based
on initial impressions.

The reason I ended up choosing cassandra over hbase mostly boilded down to
c* being easy to set up and not crashing. If it took us say 3 days to stand
up a cassandra cluster and do the hello world thing i might very well be a
voldemort user!





-- 
Sorry this was sent from mobile. Will do less grammar and spell check than
usual.

Reply via email to