On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:52 AM, DuyHai Doan <doanduy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 4) hard limit of 2*10⁹ columns per "physical" row > b. maximum number of items to be processed is 24*10⁶, far below the hard > limit of 2*10⁹ columns so point 4) does not apply either > Before discarding this point, try writing an example row this large with your actual keys and column names and values, and then reading it and compacting it. Given the lack of need for durability, I suggest turning durable_writes off. =Rob
