I would like to +1 Jan. We are using C* 2.0 and have just gone into production directly supporting the latest revision of www.nytimes.com.
I avoid new features unless I really need them; we are prepared to read code and make fixes ourselves if necessary, but it has not been. Best regards, Michael On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Jan Algermissen <jan.algermis...@nordsc.com>wrote: > > On 09.01.2014, at 03:36, Sanjeeth Kumar <sanje...@exotel.in> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > What is the latest stable version of cassandra you have in production > ? We are migrating a large chunk of our mysql database to cassandra. I see > a lot of discussions regarding 1.* versions, but I have not seen / could > not find discussions regarding using 2.* versions in production. Any > suggestions for the version based on your experience? > > > > I came to C* with 2.0 and have it up an running since about August. I have > a production environment but can live with occasional problems. I could > even setup the whole 3-node cluster from scratch without being killed :-) > > So I am happy with 2.0 having a short history of production use. > > What I noticed or saw on the list is that newer features (auto-paging, CAS > support) seem to make it into the production releases in a non-production > state. > > It appears this is generally accepted practice in the community - and > honestly, I would not really know how to thoroughly test such features > without handing them to the community to run them. So I do not think the C* > crew is to blame, really. > > I have not had any issues with C* 2.0 when steering clear of these > features (e.g. manually disable paging when working with ranges and do it > yourself). > > Jan > > > > > - Sanjeeth > >