> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sylvain Lebresne [mailto:sylv...@datastax.com]
> Sent: 18 December 2013 10:45
> 
> You seem to be well aware that you're not looking at using Cassandra for
> what it is designed for (which obviously imply you'll need to expect under-
> optimal behavior), so I'm not going to insist on it.

Very kind of you. ;)

I'm suspect that that this requirement is viscerally horrifying, but as I said, 
it's idiosyncratic, specified by an... idiosyncrat.

It's a pragmatic solution that I'm looking for, just to get a proof of concept 
going, it doesn't have to be elegant at this stage.

> As to how you could achieve that, a relatively simple solution (that do not
> require writing your own partitioner) would consist in using 2 datacenters
> (that obviously don't have to be real physical datacenter), to put the one 
> that
> should have it all in one datacenter with RF=1 and to pull all other nodes in
> the other datacenter with RF=0.
> 
> As Janne said, you could still have hint being written by other nodes if the
> one storage node is dead, but you can use the system property
> cassandra.maxHintTTL to 0 to disable hints.

Thanks Sylvain, I'll look into that.  I'm coming to Cassandra cold, I hadn't 
even spotted that the replication factor was configurable - I don't see an 
option for in the cassandra.yaml that came with 2.0.2.  I should be able to 
figure it out though, and that's great news, it looks like it takes care of one 
issue.

However, I'm not immediately seeing how to control which node will get the 
single copy of the data.  Won't the partitioner still allocate data around the 
cluster?

Ah, is a "datacentre" a logical group *within* an overall cluster?  So I can 
create a separate "datacentre" for each node, and if I write to that node the 
data will be forced to stay in that datacentre, i.e. that node?

I do apologise for the noobish questions, my attention is currently split 
between investigating several possible solutions.  I rather favour Cassandra 
though, if I can hobble it appropriately.

Kind regards,

-Colin MacDonald- 

Reply via email to