Thats it! I knew NetworkTopologyStrategy goes through racks when writing,
but didn't consider that the first one will most likely be used.
I'll re-arrange my nodes to be a,b,c,a,b,c
Thanks,
Katriel
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Derek Williams <de...@fyrie.net> wrote:
> The problem is that NetworkTopologyStrategy will try to pick nodes that
> have a different rack when going around the ring, so the second node in
> each rack always gets skipped unless it was the first node picked. Your
> nodes is eu-west go a,a,b,b,c,c but they should be a,b,c,a,b,c.
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Katriel Traum <katr...@google.com>wrote:
>
>> Hello list,
>>
>> I have a problem with my cluster ownership not being as expected.
>>
>> I have 2 DC cluster using NetworkTopologyStrategy on and
>> EC2MultiRegionSnitch with cassandra 1.1.5. My placement strategy for all
>> keyspaces is: {eu-west: 3, us-east:3 }, and I have 6 nodes in eu-west and 3
>> in us-east.
>> I expected the resulting effective ownership for nodes in us-east to be
>> 100% (Which it is), and %50 in eu-west (Which it is not).
>>
>> The cluster started out with 3 nodes in eu-west, and after adding 3 more
>> nodes, I got the following effective ownership:
>>
>> 1.1.1.1 eu-west 1a Up Normal 89.33 GB 83.33%
>> 0
>> 2.2.2.1 us-east 1b Up Normal 88.84 GB 100.00%
>> 1
>> 1.1.1.4 eu-west 1a Up Normal 75.61 GB 16.67%
>> 28356863910078205288614550619314017621
>> 1.1.1.2 eu-west 1b Up Normal 89 GB 83.33%
>> 56713727820156410577229101238628035242
>> 2.2.2.2 us-east 1d Up Normal 88.34 GB 100.00%
>> 56713727820156410577229101238628035243
>> 1.1.1.5 eu-west 1b Up Normal 75.43 GB 16.67%
>> 85070591730234615865843651857942052863
>> 1.1.1.3 eu-west 1c Up Normal 81.1 GB 83.33%
>> 113427455640312821154458202477256070484
>> 2.2.2.3 us-east 1e Up Normal 93.22 GB 100.00%
>> 113427455640312821154458202477256070485
>> 1.1.1.6 eu-west 1c Up Normal 75.39 GB 16.67%
>> 141784319550391026443072753096570088105
>>
>> What am I missing here?
>>
>> TIA,
>> Katriel
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Derek Williams
>
