On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Piavlo <lolitus...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I can't understand how statistically it's possible that with random > partitioner some nodes have x2 more keys than others with 50-100 millions > of keys per node. > 1) you have very high row variance and really really bad luck with the distribution of your super-huge rows OR 2) you have repaired some nodes and not others, and have dramatically over-repaired the repaired ones, possibly due to f/e TTL + repair issues in 1.0.x The simple way to see if #2 is the case is to run a major compaction on a good and a bad node. They should end up the same size. There are operational implications to doing a major compaction, however, so you might want to investigate the use of checksstablegarbage [1]. =Rob [1] https://github.com/cloudian/support-tools
