Also, looking through the log, it appears a lot of the files end with ic-#### 
which I assume is associated with a secondary index I have on the table.  Are 
secondary indexes really expensive from a file descriptor standpoint?  That 
particular table uses the default compaction scheme...

On Jul 15, 2013, at 12:00 AM, Paul Ingalls <paulinga...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I have one table that is using leveled.  It was set to 10MB, I will try 
> changing it to 256MB.  Is there a good way to merge the existing sstables?
> 
> On Jul 14, 2013, at 5:32 PM, Jonathan Haddad <j...@jonhaddad.com> wrote:
> 
>> Are you using leveled compaction?  If so, what do you have the file size set 
>> at?  If you're using the defaults, you'll have a ton of really small files.  
>> I believe Albert Tobey recommended using 256MB for the table 
>> sstable_size_in_mb to avoid this problem.
>> 
>> 
>> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Paul Ingalls <paulinga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm running into a problem where instances of my cluster are hitting over 
>> 450K open files.  Is this normal for a 4 node 1.2.6 cluster with replication 
>> factor of 3 and about 50GB of data on each node?  I can push the file 
>> descriptor limit up, but I plan on having a much larger load so I'm 
>> wondering if I should be looking at something else….
>> 
>> Let me know if you need more info…
>> 
>> Paul
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Jon Haddad
>> http://www.rustyrazorblade.com
>> skype: rustyrazorblade
> 

Reply via email to