The binary protocol is able to multiplex multiple requests using a single connection, which can lead to much better performance (similar to HTTP vs SPDY). This is without comparing the performance of thrift vs binary protocol, which I assume the binary protocol would be faster since it is specialized for cassandra requests.
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Renato Marroquín Mogrovejo < renatoj.marroq...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey Shamim, > > Why do you say that Java-Driver has better performance over Hector or > Astyanax? Is there any reasons for this? > Thanks. > > > Renato M. > > 2013/5/5 Shamim <sre...@yandex.ru>: > > Hi, > > Astyanax is just a refactoring of Hector and implements a few common > cassandra use cases. Very easy to use api. In Astyanax you will found all > the functions from hector. For better performance you can also check > datastax java driver https://github.com/datastax/java-driver. > > > > There are another lightweight client from twitter > https://github.com/twitter/cassie > > > > -- > > Best regards > > Shamim A. > > > > 05.05.2013, 05:30, "李 晗" <bjb...@me.com>: > >> hello， > >> i want to know which cassandra client is better？ > >> and what are their advantages and disadvantages？ > >> > >> thanks > -- Derek Williams
