Thanks Aaron for the suggestion. I am not sure, I was able to understand regarding one node thing you mentioned on the native binary protocol? Can you please elaborate that?
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:21 AM, aaron morton <aa...@thelastpickle.com>wrote: > One node on the native binary protocol, AFAIK it's still considered beta > in 1.2 > > Also +1 for Astyanax > > Cheers > > ----------------- > Aaron Morton > Freelance Cassandra Consultant > New Zealand > > @aaronmorton > http://www.thelastpickle.com > > On 17/04/2013, at 6:50 PM, Francisco Trujillo <f.truji...@genetwister.nl> > wrote: > > > Hi > > > > We are using Cassandra 1.6 at this moment. We start to work with Hector, > because it is the first recommendation that you can find in a simple google > search for java clients Cassandra. > > > > We start using Hector but when we start to have non dynamically column > families, that can be managed using cql, we start to use astyanax because: > > - It is easy to understand the code even for people who has > never worked with Cassandra. > > - The cql implementation offer more capabilities > > - Astyanax is prepared to use Cql 3 and with hector we > experienced some problems (probably our fault, but with Astyanax everything > works from the beginning). > > - Astyanax allow to use compound primary keys. > > > > In next months we are going to substitute Hector by Astyanax totally but > at this moment we are using both: > > > > - Astyanax for cql. > > - Hector for dynamic column families. > > > > > > From: Techy Teck [mailto:comptechge...@gmail.com] > > Sent: woensdag 17 april 2013 8:14 > > To: user > > Subject: Re: Cassandra Client Recommendation > > > > Thanks Everton for the suggestion. Couple of questions- > > > > 1) Does Astyanax client have any problem with previous version of > Cassandra? > > 2) You said one problem, that it will consume more memory? Can you > elaborate that slightly? What do you mean by that? > > 3) Does Astyanax supports asynch capabilities? > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 11:05 PM, Everton Lima <peitin.inu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi Techy, > > > > We are using Astyanax with cassandra 1.2.4. > > > > beneficits: > > * It is so easy to configure and use. > > * Good wiki > > * Mantained by Netflix > > * Solution to manage the store of big files (more than 15mb) > > * Solution to read all rows efficiently > > > > problems: > > * It consume more memory > > > > > > 2013/4/16 Techy Teck <comptechge...@gmail.com> > > Hello, > > > > I have recently started working with Cassandra Database. Now I am in the > process of evaluating which Cassandra client I should go forward with. > > I am mainly interested in these three- > > > > --1) Astyanax client > > > > 2--) New Datastax client that uses Binary protocol. > > > > --3) Pelops client > > > > > > > > Can anyone provide some thoughts on this? Some advantages and > disadvantages for these three will be great start for me. > > > > > > > > Keeping in mind, we are running Cassandra 1.2.2 in production > environment. > > > > > > Thanks for the help. > > > > > > > > -- > > Everton Lima Aleixo > > Bacharel em Ciência da Computação pela UFG > > Mestrando em Ciência da Computação pela UFG > > Programador no LUPA > > > >
