Yeah, I remember reading about that, but the schema had already been set and submitted. I will have to take that into consideration when discussing the results.
Thanks, Hannah On 16 Apr 2013, at 17:42, Robert Coli <rc...@eventbrite.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 3:56 AM, jrdn hannah <j...@jrdnhannah.co.uk> wrote: > For example, on updating a single table in MySQL, with the equivalent super > column in Cassandra, I was getting results of 0.231 ms for MySQL and 1.248ms > for Cassandra to perform the update 1000 times. > > You probably do not want to use a Supercolumn. They have been in a state of > quasi-supported semi-deprecation for years now... > > =Rob >
