> I've been playing around with trying to figure out what is making compactions 
> run so slow.
Is this regular compaction or table upgrades ? 
I *think* upgrade tables is single threaded. 

Do you have some compaction logs lines that say "Compacted to…"? It's handy to 
see the throughput and the number of keys compacted.

> snapshot_before_compaction: false
> in_memory_compaction_limit_in_mb: 256
> multithreaded_compaction: true
> compaction_throughput_mb_per_sec: 128
> compaction_preheat_key_cache: true
What setting for concurrent_compactors ? 

I would also check the logs for GC issues. 

Cheers

-----------------
Aaron Morton
Freelance Cassandra Developer
New Zealand

@aaronmorton
http://www.thelastpickle.com

On 28/11/2012, at 4:23 AM, Derek Bromenshenkel <derek.bromenshen...@gmail.com> 
wrote:

> Setup: C* 1.1.6, 6 node (Linux, 64GB RAM, 16 Core CPU, 2x512 SSD), RF=3, 
> 1.65TB 
> total used
> Background: Client app is off - no reads/writes happening. Doing some cluster 
> maintenance requiring node repairs and upgradesstables.
> 
> I've been playing around with trying to figure out what is making compactions 
> run so slow.  Watching syslogs, it seems to average 3-4MB/s.  That just seems 
> so 
> slow for this set up and the fact there is zero external load on the cluster. 
>  
> As far as I can tell:
> 1. Not I/O bound according to iostat data 
> 2. CPU seems to be idiling also
> 3. From my understanding, I am using all the correct compaction settings for 
> this setup: Here are those below:
> 
> snapshot_before_compaction: false
> in_memory_compaction_limit_in_mb: 256
> multithreaded_compaction: true
> compaction_throughput_mb_per_sec: 128
> compaction_preheat_key_cache: true
> 
> Some other thoughts:
> - I have turned on DEBUG logging for the Throttle class and played with the 
> live 
> compaction_throughput_mb_per_sec setting.  I can see it performing the 
> throttling if I set the value low (say 4), but anything over 8 it is 
> apparently 
> running wide open. [Side note: Although the math for the Throttle class adds 
> up, 
> over all the throttling seems to be very very conservative.]
> - I accidently turned on DEBUG for the entire ...compaction.* package and 
> that 
> unintentionally created A LOT of I/O from the ParallelCompactionIterable 
> class, 
> and the disk/OS handled that just fine.
> 
> Perhaps I just don't fully grasp what is going on or have the correct 
> expectations.  I am OK with things being slow if the hardware is working 
> hard, 
> but that does not seem to be the case.
> 
> Anyone have some insight?
> 
> Thanks
> 

Reply via email to