Have you actually tested to see that the Thrift API is more performant than CQL for your application? As far as I know, CQL almost always has a performance advantage over the Thrift API.
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Everton Lima <peitin.inu...@gmail.com>wrote: > For some reason I can not reply my old thread in that list. So I was > creating a new one. > > The problem is that I do not use thrift to gain in performace. Why it is > nicer with concurrent modifications? I do not know why I have falling in > the problem of concurrent modification if I was creating 2 keyspaces > diferent in only one process with just one thread. Someone knows why? > > > -- > > Everton Lima Aleixo > Bacharel em Ciencia da Computação > Universidade Federal de Goiás > -- Tyler Hobbs DataStax <http://datastax.com/>
