I did overlook something. get_range_slice will invoke cfs.getRawCachedRow instead of cfs.getThroughCache. Hence, no row will be cached if it's not present in the row cache. Well, this puzzles me further as to that how the range of rows is expected to get stored into the row cache in the first place.
Would someone please clarify it for me? Thanks in advance. On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Manu Zhang <owenzhang1...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've asked this question before. And after reading the source codes, I > find that get_range_slice doesn't query rowcache before reading from > Memtable and SSTable. I just want to make sure whether I've overlooked > something. If my observation is correct, what's the consideration here?
