Thank you! That article helps clear up a lot of my confusion about the changes between CQL 2 and 3, since I was wondering how to access/manipulate CompositeType/DynamicCompositeType columns through CQL.
So does this mean that in CQL 3 an explicit schema is absolutely mandatory? It's now impossible (within CQL) to add new (non-primary-key) columns only for individual rows implicitly with DML-queries (insert/update)?. 2012/10/29 Sylvain Lebresne <sylv...@datastax.com>: > CQL3 does absolutely allow dynamic column families, but does it > differently from CQL2. See > http://www.datastax.com/dev/blog/cql3-for-cassandra-experts. > > -- > Sylvain > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Timmy Turner <timm.t...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Does CQL3 not allow dynamic columns (column names) any more?
