"I see. So if I don't use the '-pr' option, triggering repair on node-00 is
sufficient to repair the first 3 nodes.
No need to cron a repair on node-{01,02}.
correct?"
"forget it. this was nonsense."
In my mind it does make sense, and what you're saying is correct. But I
read that it was better to run repair in each node with a "-pr" option.
Alain
2012/10/16 Alexis Midon <alexismi...@gmail.com>
> forget it. this was nonsense.
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Alexis Midon <alexismi...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I see. So if I don't use the '-pr' option, triggering repair on node-00
>> is sufficient to repair the first 3 nodes.
>> No need to cron a repair on node-{01,02}.
>> correct?
>>
>> thanks for your answer.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Andrey Ilinykh <ailin...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Only one region (node-00 is responsible for) will get repaired on all
>>> three nodes.
>>> Andrey
>>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Alexis Midon <alexismi...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hi all,
>>> >
>>> > I have a 9-node cluster with a replication factor R=3. When I run
>>> repair -pr
>>> > on node-00, I see the exact same load and activity on node-{01,02}.
>>> > Specifically, compactionstats shows the same Validation tasks.
>>> > Does this mean that all 3 nodes will be repaired when nodetool
>>> returns? or
>>> > do I still have to trigger a nodetool-repair on node-{01,02}?
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> >
>>> > Alexis
>>>
>>
>>
>
