I think that would be cool. /Martin Koch - Issuu - Senior Software Architect
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Ertio Lew <ertio...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think Cassandra should provide an configurable option on per column > family basis to do columns sorting by time-stamp rather than column names. > This would be really helpful to maintain time-sorted columns without using > up the column name as time-stamps which might otherwise be used to store > most relevant column names useful for retrievals. Very frequently we need > to store data sorted in time order. Therefore I think this may be a very > general requirement & not specific to just my use-case alone. > > Does it makes sense to create an issue for this ? > > > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 2:38 AM, aaron morton <aa...@thelastpickle.com>wrote: > >> If you mean order by the column timestamp (as passed by the client) that >> it not possible. >> >> Can you use your own timestamps as the column name and store them as long >> values ? >> >> Aaron >> >> On 25 Mar 2011, at 09:30, Narendra Sharma wrote: >> >> > Cassandra 0.7.4 >> > Column names in my CF are of type byte[] but I want to order columns by >> timestamp. What is the best way to achieve this? Does it make sense for >> Cassandra to support ordering of columns by timestamp as option for a >> column family irrespective of the column name type? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Naren >> >> >
