On 12 Sep 2012, at 00:50, Omid Aladini wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Janne Jalkanen > <janne.jalka...@ecyrd.com> wrote: >> >> Does this mean that LCS on 1.0.x should be considered unsafe to >> use? I'm using them for semi-wide frequently-updated CounterColumns >> and they're performing much better on LCS than on STCS. > > That's true. "Unsafe" in the sense that your data might not be in the > right shape with respect to order of keys in sstables and LCS's > properties and you might need to offline-scrub when you upgrade to the > latest 1.1.x.
OK, so what's the worst case here? Data loss? Bad performance? > The fix was released on 1.1.3 (LCS fix) and 1.1.4 (offline scrub) and > I agree it would be helpful to have it on NEWS.txt. I'll file a bug on this, unless someone can get to it first :) /Janne
