Answered in the other email as well, cache stats are in nodetool info. 

But you also have to set the "caching" property of the CF. By default it's 
keys_only. It should be documented in the cassanra-cli and the CQL docs 
http://www.datastax.com/docs/1.1/references/cql/index

cheers

-----------------
Aaron Morton
Freelance Developer
@aaronmorton
http://www.thelastpickle.com

On 23/08/2012, at 2:18 AM, Amit Handa <amithand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> hi all,
> 
> I am exploring apache cassandra 1.1.3. I am facing problem with how to 
> improve performance of cassandra using caching configurations.
> 
> I modified key_cache_size_in_mb and row_cache_size_in_mb values inside 
> cassandra.yaml. 
> key_cache_size_in_mb: 20008
>  row_cache_size_in_mb: 14000
> 
> 
> 
> Please let me know how to verify that the setting for key_cache_size and 
> row_chache_size has taken place. 
> 
> 
> When i am checking that this particular configuration are really been 
> configured using command:  
> ./nodetool -h 107.108.189.212 cfstats
> 
> it's showing following results for keySpace DemoUser and column Family Users:
> Keyspace: DemoUser 
>     Read Count: 21914 
>     Read Latency: 0.08268495026010769 ms. 
>     Write Count: 87656 
>     Write Latency: 0.06009481381765082 ms. 
>     Pending Tasks: 0 
>         Column Family: Users 
>         SSTable count: 1 
>         Space used (live): 1573335 
>         Space used (total): 1573335 
>         Number of Keys (estimate): 22016 
>         Memtable Columns Count: 0 
>         Memtable Data Size: 0 
>         Memtable Switch Count: 1 
>         Read Count: 21914 
>         Read Latency: 0.083 ms. 
>         Write Count: 87656 
>         Write Latency: 0.060 ms. 
>         Pending Tasks: 0 
>         Bloom Filter False Postives: 0 
>         Bloom Filter False Ratio: 0.00000 
>         Bloom Filter Space Used: 41104 
>         Compacted row minimum size: 150 
>         Compacted row maximum size: 179 
>         Compacted row mean size: 179 
> 
> I am unable to see the effect of key_cache_size_in_mb and 
> row_cache_size_in_mb.
> 
> With Regards,
> Amit
> 

Reply via email to