Sounds a lot like a bug that I hit that was filed and fixed recently: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-4432
-Mike On Jul 12, 2012, at 8:16 PM, Edward Capriolo wrote: > Possibly the bug with nanotime causing cassandra to think the change happened > in the past. Talked about onlist in past few days. > On Thursday, July 12, 2012, aaron morton <aa...@thelastpickle.com> wrote: > > Do multiple nodes say the RF is 2 ? Can you show the output from the CLI ? > > Do show schema and show keyspace say the same thing ? > > Cheers > > > > > > ----------------- > > Aaron Morton > > Freelance Developer > > @aaronmorton > > http://www.thelastpickle.com > > On 13/07/2012, at 7:39 AM, Dustin Wenz wrote: > > > > We recently increased the replication factor of a keyspace in our cassandra > > 1.1.1 cluster from 2 to 4. This was done by setting the replication factor > > to 4 in cassandra-cli, and then running a repair on each node. > > > > Everything seems to have worked; the commands completed successfully and > > disk usage increased significantly. However, if I perform a describe on the > > keyspace, it still shows replication_factor:2. So, it appears that the > > replication factor might be 4, but it reports as 2. I'm not entirely sure > > how to confirm one or the other. > > > > Since then, I've stopped and restarted the cluster, and even ran an > > upgradesstables on each node. The replication factor still doesn't report > > as I would expect. Am I missing something here? > > > > - .Dustin > > > > > >
