On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 1:24 PM, jmodha <jmo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Out of interest, we're not specifying a specific chunk size on the schema
> (in the hope that it would just use the default of 64kb), so it reads
> something like:
Actually, we've had bugs related to the handling of the chunk size in early 1.0
releases and if I remember correctly that was fully fixed only in
1.0.5. So it is
possible that your 1.0.3 sstables are cmpressed but with a ridiculously low
chunk size (like 64 bytes instead of 64K), which would amount to no
compression.
In that case then yes it is a bug, but one that has been fixed by
upgrading to 1.1.
--
Sylvain
> "create column family test
> with column_type = 'Standard'
> and comparator = 'BytesType'
> and default_validation_class = 'UTF8Type'
> and key_validation_class = 'BytesType'
> and compaction_strategy =
> 'org.apache.cassandra.db.compaction.SizeTieredCompactionStrategy'
> and compression_options = {'sstable_compression' :
> 'org.apache.cassandra.io.compress.SnappyCompressor'};"
>
> Would this cause any issues?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://cassandra-user-incubator-apache-org.3065146.n2.nabble.com/BulkLoading-SSTables-and-compression-tp7580849p7580933.html
> Sent from the cassandra-u...@incubator.apache.org mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
